Views of Young People Living with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Ghana
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the views of young people living with Type 1 diabetes regarding the usability, benefits, and challenges of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices. Given the limited availability and high cost of CGMs in Ghana, the research aimed to understand how these young people navigate their diabetes management with this technology. Through qualitative interviews with ten (10) young people aged 15-24 years, the study gathered insights into their daily use of CGMs. The findings revealed that while CGMs significantly enhance blood sugar control and increase awareness of the impact of lifestyle choices on glucose levels, they also present challenges. Participants reported issues such as the high cost of CGMs, technical difficulties, physical discomfort from sensors, and social stigma associated with wearing the devices. Despite these challenges, the study highlighted the potential of CGMs to improve diabetes management for young people, provided that the barriers of cost and usability can be addressed. The study recommends that young people should read more about CGM and how it can be used effectively.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Yeboah DA, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Derrick Anim Yeboah, University of Cape Coast, Department of Population and Health
Graduate, Department of Population and Health
Mrs Rita Tekpertey, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Graduate, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Lucier J, Mathias PM. Type 1 Diabetes. [Updated 2024 Oct 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. [cited 2025 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507713/
Kahanovitz L, Sluss PM, Russell SJ. Type 1 Diabetes - A Clinical Perspective. Point Care. 2017;16(1):37–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/poc.0000000000000125
Subramanian S, Baidal D. The Management of Type 1 Diabetes. [Updated 2021 May 22]. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. [cited 2025 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279114/
Reynolds A, Mitri J. Dietary Advice For Individuals with Diabetes. [Updated 2024 Apr 28]. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. [cited 2025 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279012/
Adhikari M, Devkota HR, Cesuroglu T. Barriers to and facilitators of diabetes self-management practices in Rupandehi, Nepal- multiple stakeholders’ perspective. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1269. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11308-4
Maina PM, Pienaar M, Reid M. Self-management practices for preventing complications of type II diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023;5:100136. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100136
Dowou RK, Amu H, Bain LE, Saah FI, Arthur LE, Tarkang EE. Management of chronic non-communicable diseases: qualitative study of the practices and challenges in the Volta Region, Ghana. J Glob Health Sci. 2024;6(1):e1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35500/jghs.2024.6.e1
Avogo WA. Community characteristics and the risk of non-communicable diseases in Ghana. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(1):e0000692. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000692
International Diabetes Federation. Type 1 diabetes. Brussels: IDF; 2022. [cited 2025 Apr 28]. Available from: https://idf.org/about-diabetes/types-of-diabetes/type-1-diabetes/
Niechciał E, Michalak M, Skowrońska B, Fichna P. Increasing trend of childhood type 1 diabetes incidence: 20-year observation from Greater Poland Province, Poland. Acta Diabetol. 2024;61:1609–1617. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02339-5
Stene LC, Norris JM, Rewers MJ. Risk Factors for Type 1 Diabetes. 2023 Dec 20. In: Lawrence JM, Casagrande SS, Herman WH, et al., editors. Diabetes in America [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); 2023–. [cited 2025 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597412/
Zorena K, Michalska M, Kurpas M, Jaskulak M, Murawska A, Rostami S. Environmental Factors and the Risk of Developing Type 1 Diabetes—Old Disease and New Data. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(4):608. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040608
Ali O. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Epidemiology, Genetics, Pathogenesis, and Clinical Manifestations. In: Poretsky L, editor. Principles of Diabetes Mellitus. Cham: Springer; 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20797-1_12-1
Quinn LM, Wong FS, Narendran P. Environmental Determinants of Type 1 Diabetes: From Association to Proving Causality. Front Immunol. 2021;12:737964. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.737964
Zysberg L, Lang T. Supporting parents of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a literature review. Patient Intell. 2025;7:21–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/PI.S77566
Houeiss P, Luce S, Boitard C. Environmental Triggering of Type 1 Diabetes Autoimmunity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:933965. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.933965
Sims EK, Besser REJ, Dayan C, Rasmussen CG, Greenbaum C, Griffin KJ, et al. Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in the General Population: A Status Report and Perspective. Diabetes. 2022;71(4):610–623. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi20-0054
Simmons KM, Sims EK. Screening and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes: Where Are We? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(12):3067–3079. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad328
Phillip M, Achenbach P, Addala A, Albanese-O’Neill A, Battelino T, Bell KJ, et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2024;67:1731–1759. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06205-5
Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, Rhee DK, Zera C, Tunçalp Ö, Lucido B, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels among pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023;4:1006041. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2023.1006041
Weinstock RS, Aleppo G, Bailey TS, Bergenstal RM, Fisher WA, Greenwood DA, et al. The Role of Blood Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes Management. Arlington (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2020. [cited 2025 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566165/
Rao PV, Makkar BM, Kumar A, Das AK, Singh AK, Mithal A, et al. RSSDI consensus on self-monitoring of blood glucose in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in India. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2018;38:260–279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-018-0677-3
Reddy N, Verma N, Dungan K. Monitoring Technologies—Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Mobile Technology, Biomarkers of Glycemic Control. [Updated 2023 Jul 8]. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. [cited 2025 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279046/
Ewen M, Lepeska M, Abdraimova A, Besançon S, Cham NTP, Dunganova A, et al. Availability, prices and affordability of self-monitoring blood glucose devices: surveys in six low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Public Health. 2025;3:e001128. Available from: [DOI currently not available; check journal site]
Gabbay MAL, Rodacki M, Calliari LE, Vianna AGD, Krakauer M, Pinto MS, et al. Time in range: a new parameter to evaluate blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12:22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00529-z
Abubeker KM, Ramani R, Krishnamoorthy R, Gogula S, Baskar S, Muthu S, et al. Internet of Things enabled open source assisted real-time blood glucose monitoring framework. Sci Rep. 2024;14:6151. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56677-z
Dey K, Santra TS, Tseng FG. Advancements in Glucose Monitoring: From Traditional Methods to Wearable Sensors. Appl Sci. 2025;15(5):2523. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052523
Mittal R, Koutras N, Maya J, Lemos JRN, Hirani K. Blood glucose monitoring devices for type 1 diabetes: a journey from the food and drug administration approval to market availability. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1352302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1352302
Mathew TK, Zubair M, Tadi P. Blood Glucose Monitoring. [Updated 2023 Apr 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. [cited 2025 Apr 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555976/
Krakauer M, Botero JF, Lavalle-González FJ, Proietti A, Barbieri DE. A review of flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021;13:42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-021-00654-3
Ribet F, Stemme G, Roxhed N. Real-time intradermal continuous glucose monitoring using a minimally invasive microneedle-based system. Biomed Microdevices. 2018;20:101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-018-0349-6
Friedman JG, Cardona Matos Z, Szmuilowicz ED, Aleppo G. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors to Manage Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023;16:263–276. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/pgpm.s374663
Mazzotta FA, Lucaccini Paoli L, Rizzi A, Tartaglione L, Leo ML, Popolla V, et al. Unmet needs in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: why is it so difficult to achieve an improvement in metabolic control? Nutr Diabetes. 2024;14:58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00319-w
Sakar K, Cinar N. Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. IntechOpen; 2024. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/1151359
Glocker V, Bachmann S, Hess M, Szinnai G, Burckhardt M-A. Fear of hypoglycemia and quality of life in young people with type 1 diabetes and their parents in the era of sensor glucose monitoring. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:958671. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.958671
Hermanns N, Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Waldenmaier D, Ehrmann D. Impact of CGM on the Management of Hypoglycemia Problems: Overview and Secondary Analysis of the HypoDE Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019;13(4):636–644. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819831695
Flockhart M, Larsen FJ. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Endurance Athletes: Interpretation and Relevance of Measurements for Improving Performance and Health. Sports Med. 2024;54:247–255. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01910-4
Klonoff DC, Nguyen KT, Xu NY, Gutierrez A, Espinoza JC, Vidmar AP. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors by People Without Diabetes: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(6):1686–1697. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221110830
Klupa T, Czupryniak L, Dzida G, Fichna P, Jarosz-Chobot P, et al. Expanding the Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Modern Diabetes Care Beyond Type 1 Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2023;14:1241–1266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01431-3
Reaven PD, Newell M, Rivas S, Zhou X, Norman GJ, Zhou JJ. Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Linked to Improved Glycemic Control and Fewer Clinical Events in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in the Veterans Health Administration. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(4):854–863. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-2189
Phillip M, Danne T, Shalitin S, Buckingham B, Laffel L, Tamborlane W, Battelino T, for the F.T.C.F. Participants. Use of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13:215–228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00849.x
Głowińska-Olszewska B, Tobiaszewska M, Łuczyński W, Bossowski A. Monthly use of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system as an educational and motivational tool for poorly controlled type 1 diabetes adolescents. Adv Med Sci. 2013;58:344–352. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Tobiaszewska+M&cauthor_id=23917476
Alfadhli E, Osman E, Basri T. Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as an educational tool for patients with gestational diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016;8:48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0161-5
Rivera-Ávila DA, Esquivel-Lu AI, Salazar-Lozano CR, Jones K, Doubova SV. The effects of professional continuous glucose monitoring as an adjuvant educational tool for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21:79. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00742-5
Sawyer B, Hilliard E, Hackney KJ, Stastny S. Barriers and Strategies for Type 1 Diabetes Management Among Emerging Adults: A Qualitative Study. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022;15:11795514221098389. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221098389
Agarwal S, Simmonds I, Myers AK. The Use of Diabetes Technology to Address Inequity in Health Outcomes: Limitations and Opportunities. Curr Diab Rep. 2022;22(7):275–281. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01470-3
Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, Hirsch IB, Kirkman MS, Klupa T, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021;64(12):2609–2652. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8481000/
Klonoff AN, Lee WA, Xu NY, Nguyen KT, DuBord A, Kerr D. Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;17(1):239–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968211043498
Fleming GA, Petrie JR, Bergenstal RM, Holl RW, Peters AL, Heinemann L, et al. Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetologia. 2020;63:229–241. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-05034-1
Jacobsen LM, Sherr JL, Considine E, Chen A, Peeling SM, Hulsmans M, et al. Utility and precision evidence of technology in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Commun Med. 2023;3:132. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00358-x
Friedman JG, Cardona Matos Z, Szmuilowicz ED, Aleppo G. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors to Manage Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023;16:263–276. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/pgpm.s374663
Rubelj K, Stipančić G, La Grasta Sabolić L, Požgaj Šepec M. Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Control in Child, Adolescent and Young Adult Population - Arguments for Its Use and Effects. Acta Clin Croat. 2021;60(4):609–616. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.04.07
Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, Hirsch IB, Kirkman MS, Klupa T, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021;64:2609–2652. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05568-3
Chetty T, Shetty V, Fournier PA, Adolfsson P, Jones TW, Davis EA. Exercise Management for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Structured Approach to the Exercise Consultation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:326. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00326
Deeb A, Ziaullah M, Akle M, Strauss K. Utilization and Challenges of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy: A Patient Experience Analysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;13(1):146–147. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818801361
Prahalad P, Addala A, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Maahs DM. Sustained Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Low-Income Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Following Insurance Coverage Supports Expansion of Continuous Glucose Monitor Coverage for All. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(9):632–634. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0204
Owusu BA, Doku DT. Living with type 1 diabetes and schooling among young people in Ghana: a truism of health selection, inadequate support, or artefactual explanation of educational inequalities? BMC Public Health. 2024;24:1137. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18590-y
Prahalad P, Addala A, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Maahs DM. Sustained Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Low-Income Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Following Insurance Coverage Supports Expansion of Continuous Glucose Monitor Coverage for All. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(9):632–634. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0204
Letitia W, Elmarí D, Esmé VR, Sega D. Continuous glucose monitoring empowers adolescents to take responsibility of diabetes management. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2023;15(1):3879. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v15i1.3879
Tanlaka E, Aryal S. Interpretivist Constructivism: A Valuable Approach for Qualitative Nursing Research. Open J Ther Rehabil. 2025;13:8–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojtr.2025.131002
Levers MJD. Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence. SAGE Open. 2013;3(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013517243
Wijk I, Amsberg S, Andreassen Gleissman S, Toft E, Anderbro T, Johansson UB, et al. Living with Type 1 Diabetes as Experienced by Adults with Prolonged Elevated HbA1c: A Qualitative Study. Diabetes Ther. 2023;14:1673–1684. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01443-z
Capili B. Cross-Sectional Studies. Am J Nurs. 2021;121(10):59–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000794280.73744.fe
Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 2020;158(1S):S65–S71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
King E. Chronic Illness and Functionality: How It Affects Adolescents Academically and Socially and How They Can Cope. Intuition (BYU Undergrad J Psychol). 2017;12(2):8. Available from: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/intuition/vol12/iss2/8
Wood D, Crapnell T, Lau L, Bennett A, Lotstein D, Ferris M, et al. Emerging Adulthood as a Critical Stage in the Life Course. In: Halfon N, Forrest C, Lerner R, Faustman E, editors. Handbook of Life Course Health Development. Cham: Springer; 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_7
Russo K. Assessment and Treatment of Adolescents With Chronic Medical Conditions. J Health Serv Psychol. 2022;48(2):69–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-022-00059-4
Robinson RS. Purposive Sampling. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–544. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(8):652–661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Community Health. 2019;7:e000057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Magaldi D, Berler M. Semi-structured Interviews. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Cham: Springer; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857
Tenny S, Brannan JM, Brannan GD. Qualitative Study. [Updated 2022 Sep 18]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
Oranga J, Matere A. Qualitative Research: Essence, Types and Advantages. Open Access Libr J. 2023;10:1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111001
Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(4):391–398. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
Drabble L, Trocki KF, Salcedo B, Walker PC, Korcha RA. Conducting qualitative interviews by telephone: Lessons learned from a study of alcohol use among sexual minority and heterosexual women. Qual Soc Work. 2016;15(1):118–133. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015585613
Topping M, Douglas J, Winkler D. General Considerations for Conducting Online Qualitative Research and Practice Implications for Interviewing People with Acquired Brain Injury. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019615
Rankin D, Kimbell B, Allen JM, Besser REJ, Boughton CK, Campbell F, et al. Adolescents' Experiences of Using a Smartphone Application Hosting a Closed-loop Algorithm to Manage Type 1 Diabetes in Everyday Life: Qualitative Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;15(5):1042–1051. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296821994201
Rankin D, Kimbell B, Hovorka R, Lawton J. Adolescents’ and their parents’ experiences of using a closed-loop system to manage type 1 diabetes in everyday life: qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395320985924
Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Ahmed SK, Mohammed RA, Nashwan AJ, Ibrahim RH, Abdalla AQ, Ameen BMM, Khdhir RM. Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. J Med Surg Public Health. 2025;6:100198. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Lochmiller CR. Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. Qual Rep. 2021;26(6):2029–2044. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030
Shin M, Yang Y, Kang JH, Jin HY. Exploring the Initial Encounter with Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Two-Week Trip. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024;17:3521–3534. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S466734
Oganesova Z, Pemberton J, Brown A. Innovative solution or cause for concern? The use of continuous glucose monitors in people not living with diabetes: A narrative review. Diabet Med. 2024;41(9):e15369. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.15369
Anhalt H. Limitation of continuous glucose monitor usage. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(3):115–117. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2016.0011
Abucevicz-Swick K. A Structured Diabetes Continuous Glucose Monitor Education Program to Improve Patient Knowledge and Self-Efficacy [thesis]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University; 2024. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 12543. Available from: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/12543
Kieu A, King J, Govender RD, Östlundh L. The Benefits of Utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(3):762–774. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968211070855
Laffel LM, Kanapka LG, Beck RW, Bergamo K, Clements MA, Criego A, et al. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2388–2396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6940
Alzawahreh S, Ozturk C. The Improving Effects of Diabetes Education on Diabetes Awareness and Management in Children and Adolescents with T1DM. Open J Nurs. 2024;14:164–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2024.144011
Wanjau MN, Möller H, Haigh F, Milat A, Hayek R, Lucas P, Veerman JL. Physical Activity and Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Assessment of Causality. AJPM Focus. 2023;2(2):100074. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100074
de Wit M, Gajewska KA, Goethals ER, McDarby V, Zhao X, Hapunda G, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Psychological care of children, adolescents and young adults with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1373–1389. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13428
Mangoulia P, Milionis C, Vlachou E, Ilias I. The Interrelationship between Diabetes Mellitus and Emotional Well-Being: Current Concepts and Future Prospects. Healthcare. 2024;12(14):1457. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12141457
Manov AE, Chauhan S, Dhillon G, Dhaliwal A, Antonio S, Donepudi A, et al. The Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices in Managing Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42545. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42545
Hohendorff J, Czupryniak L, Dzida G, Fichna P, Jarosz-Chobot P, Klupa T, et al. Novel methods of continuous glucose monitoring and telehealth in the improvement of diabetes care: a narrative review. Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(3):757–764. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/139025
Natale P, Chen S, Chow CK, Cheung NW, Martinez-Martin D, Caillaud C, et al. Patient experiences of continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for diabetes: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Diabetes. 2023;15(12):1048–1069. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13454
Ni K, Tampe CA, Sol K, Cervantes L, Pereira RI. Continuous Glucose Monitor: Reclaiming Type 2 Diabetes Self-efficacy and Mitigating Disparities. J Endocr Soc. 2024;8(8):bvae125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae125
de Jong LA, Li X, Emamipour S, van der Werf S, Postma MJ, van Dijk PR, et al. Evaluating the Cost-Utility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of the Methods and Quality of Studies Using Decision Models or Empirical Data. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024;42:929–953. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01388-6
Karakuş KE, Sakarya S, Yeşiltepe Mutlu G, Berkkan M, Muradoğlu S, Can E, et al. Benefits and Drawbacks of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Use in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study From a Country Where the CGM Is Not Reimbursed. J Patient Exp. 2021;8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211056523
Chen HC, Lai YH, Jiang YD. Overcoming barriers in continuous glucose monitoring: Challenges and future directions in diabetes management. J Diabetes Investig. 2025;16:769–774. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70019
Asarani NAM, Reynolds AN, Boucher SE, de Bock M, Wheeler BJ. Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14(2):328–337. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819870849
Peyyety V, Zupa MF, Hewitt B, Rodriguez Gonzalez A, Mani I, Prioleau T, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Uptake of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Youth. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2023;49(6):426–437. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2635010623120503