Extension of Medical Decision-making Connecting ‘Spiritual Intelligence’
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
Undue postoperative pain and suffering can often be minimized if a surgeon incorporates conscientious compassion and integrates spiritual intelligence, commonly referred to as SQ.
SQ is considered the “ultimate” intelligence and underpins the effective functioning of both Intellectual (IQ) and Emotional (EQ) intelligence. It is not about being ‘religious,’ but is supported by recent neurological and psychological research [1]. SQ's potential to enable creativity, reframe situations, and combine multiple forms of intelligence can significantly enhance clinical decision-making at critical moments. In this context, SQ opens new avenues of conscience and compassion, guided by wisdom that transcends self-centered experiences.
This article presents a case in which the author, both a physician and a patient, experienced severe postoperative complications unexpectedly following classical direct inguinal hernia repair one year apart by two reputable general surgeons. A simple, yet overlooked step—ensuring thoughtful and thorough desufflation(deflation) of CO2 from both extraperitoneal and ‘intraperitoneal’ spaces, if suspected, could have minimized or prevented much of the distress, if conscientious compassion had ever been utilized at the right moment. This case underscores SQ’s potential to improve outcomes through empathetic, meticulous decision-making beyond ‘standard’ expertise and highlights the crucial role of painstaking care in preventing avoidable suffering. It would reassure the expert audience of the importance of their practices.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Choi JJ.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Zohar D, Marshall I. Connecting with our Spiritual Intelligence. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2000;3-17.
Morrison Z, Kashyap S, Nirujogi VL. Adult Inguinal Hernia [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537241/
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):322-332. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200203000-00003
Lee CS, Kim JH, Choi BJ, Lee JI, Lee SC, Lee YS, et al. A retrospective study on the prevalence of recurrent inguinal hernia: a large-scale multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020;98(1):51-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.98.1.51
Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Breivik K, Kørner H. Long-term follow-up of 1059 consecutive primary and recurrent inguinal hernias in a teaching hospital. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(2):125-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750070583
Choi JJ, Choo BH. The Buddha’s empirically testable “Ten Criteria” challenges the authenticity of truth claims: a critical review and its potential applicability to debunking the various post-truths. Religions. 2019;10(12):645. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10120645