Nano Fluid Dynamics Meets Artificial Intelligence: Bifurcation, Control, and Learning-Based Stability

Main Article Content

Lakshmi N Sridhar

Abstract

This work develops a reduced-order dynamical model for ion transport and electrohydrodynamics in nano fluidic channels derived from the coupled Poisson–Nernst–Planck–Stokes equations. Spatial averaging over the channel length yields a finite-dimensional nonlinear system describing the coupled evolution of ionic concentrations, charge imbalance, and electric potential under diffusion, electromigration, and electroosmotic advection. The reduced formulation preserves the essential nonlinear electrokinetic feedback mechanisms responsible for complex dynamic behavior. Bifurcation analysis using MATCONT reveals the existence of equilibrium branches and a supercritical Hopf bifurcation at ,(Q,S,V,I)=(1.514542,0.738483,0.278626,1.446676) leading to stable limit-cycle oscillations confirmed through eigenvalue crossing and time-domain simulations. To quantify stability, a dataset of equilibrium states and Jacobian-based spectral measures is constructed for analysis and surrogate modeling. A feedforward neural network is trained to approximate the dominant eigenvalue, enabling a smooth stability indicator suitable for gradient-based optimization. The resulting surrogate is embedded into a Pyomo.DAE optimal control framework solved using IPOPT, where a differentiable soft-penalty formulation is used to suppress unstable regimes. The proposed control strategy reduces the objective function value from 16.7424 to 4.776778, demonstrating significant improvement in performance and stability regulation. Overall, the study shows that combining physics-based model reduction, numerical bifurcation analysis, and machine-learning-assisted optimal control provides an effective framework for stabilizing nonlinear nano fluidic dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

N Sridhar, L. (2026). Nano Fluid Dynamics Meets Artificial Intelligence: Bifurcation, Control, and Learning-Based Stability. Global Journal of Medical and Clinical Case Reports, 13(5), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.17352/gjmccr.000247
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Sridhar LN.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Horn RG, Israelachvili JN. Direct measurement of structural forces between two surfaces in a nonpolar liquid. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1981;75:1400-1411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.442146

Bocquet L, Barrat JL. Hydrodynamic boundary conditions and correlation functions of confined fluids. Physical Review E. 1994;49:3079-3092. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.49.3079

Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 1996. Available from: https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/490597/mod_resource/content/1/Israelachvili_Intermolecular_and_Surface_Forces.pdf

Wang LQ. Nanofluid transport behavior. Physics of Fluids. 1996;8:1553-1559.

Choi SUS. Nanofluids: from vision to reality. In: Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2004. p. 757-773. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3056479

Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature Biotechnology. 2003;21:1161-1165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05058

Hong C, Choi J, Ahn C. Nanofluidic systems for bioanalysis. Lab on a Chip. 2004;4:109-113.

Wen D, Ding Y. Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids. Chemical Engineering Science. 2005;60:32-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.07.012

Das SK, Choi SUS, Patel HE. Heat transfer in nanofluids—a review. Heat Transfer Engineering. 2006;27:3-19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01457630600904593

Peterson GP, Li C. Heat transfer of nanofluids. Advances in Heat Transfer. 2006;39:257-376.

Sudarsan AP, Ugaz VM. Multiscale transport in nanofluidics. Lab on a Chip. 2006;6:74-82.

Eijkel JCT, van den Berg A. Nanofluidics: what is it and what can we expect? Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 2005;1:249-267. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-004-0012-9

Schoch RB, Han J, Renaud P. Transport phenomena in nanofluidics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2008;80:839-883. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.839

Karnik R, et al. Nanofluidic diodes and ion transport. Nano Letters. 2007;7:547-551.

Ekinci KL, et al. High-frequency nanofluidics. Lab on a Chip. 2010;10:3013-3025.

Wang LQ, Wei XH. Nanofluid transport modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2010;53:1841-1850. Available from:

Bocquet L, Charlaix E. Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39:1073-1095. Available from:

Li D. Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. Springer; 2015.

Kavokine N, Netz RR, Bocquet L. Fluids at the nanoscale. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2020;53:377-410. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.14111

Kazoe Y, Xu Y. Advances in nanofluidics. Micromachines. 2021;12:427.

Siria A, Bocquet ML, Bocquet L. Ion transport and selectivity in nanofluidic channels. Chemical Society Reviews. 2022;51:10264-10289.

Bocquet L, Charlaix E. Nanofluidics in the energy and information era. Nature Reviews Physics. 2023;5:647-664.

Wang Z, Zhang J, Li D. Machine learning-enabled modeling and control of nonlinear transport processes in micro/nanofluidic systems. AIChE Journal. 2024;70:e18045.

Wasan DT, Nikolov AD. Spreading of nanofluids on solids. Nature. 2003;423:156-159. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01591

Edel JB, deMello AJ. Nanofluidics: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2008. Available from: https://www.amazon.in/Nanofluidics-Nanoscience-Nanotechnology-Joshua-Edel/dp/0854041478

Piruska A, et al. Nanofluidics in chemical analysis. Chemical Society Reviews. 2010;39:1060-1072.

Sparreboom W, van den Berg A, Eijkel J. Principles and applications of nanofluidics. Nature Nanotechnology. 2009;4:713-720. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.332

Dhooge A, Govaerts W, Kuznetsov AY. MATCONT: a MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 2003;29(2):141-164. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/779359.779362

Hart WE, Laird CD, Watson JP, Woodruff DL, Hackebeil GA, Nicholson BL, et al. Pyomo – Optimization Modeling in Python. 2nd ed. Vol. 67. Springer; 2017. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1771935

Wächter A, Biegler L. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming. 2006;106:25-57. Available from: https://cepac.cheme.cmu.edu/pasilectures/biegler/ipopt.pdf

Eijkel J. Nanofluidics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2009;394:383-384. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y

Kuznetsov YA. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. New York: Springer; 1998.

Govaerts WJF. Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2000.