Female Sexuality in a University Population: An Observational Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Sexuality is a fundamental dimension of women’s health and quality of life. Despite its importance, published evidence on the prevalence and nature of sexual difficulties in the Portuguese female population remains limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of sexual difficulties, their comorbidity, and the level of associated sexual distress.
Methods: This observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study enrolled 60 female students from the University of the Algarve aged 18–25 years. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire together with three validated instruments: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Female Sexual Distress Scale–Revised (FSDS-R), and the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). Descriptive analysis of prevalence and comorbidity of sexual difficulties was performed.
Results: At least one sexual difficulty was identified in 75% of participants. Lack of sexual desire/interest was the most prevalent difficulty (42%), followed by difficulty achieving orgasm (37%), dyspareunia (22%), lubrication difficulties (10%), and arousal difficulties (7%). Regarding sexual satisfaction, 27% of participants reported dissatisfaction with their current sex life, while 7% reported distress attributable to their sexual difficulties.
Conclusions: Sexual difficulties are highly prevalent in this cohort of young, highly educated women, although only a minority report associated sexual distress. These findings underscore the importance of promoting sexual health information and open discussion, specifically targeting this age group.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Capela E, et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
World Health Organization. Defining sexual health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/sexual-and-reproductive-health-and-research/key-areas-of-work/sexual-health/defining-sexual-health
Ribeiro B, Magalhães A, Mota I. Female sexual dysfunction in reproductive age: prevalence and associated factors. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2013;29(1):16-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i1.11044
Peixoto MM, Nobre P. Prevalence and sociodemographic predictors of sexual problems in Portugal: a population-based study with women aged 18 to 79 years. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(2):169-180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.842195
Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281(6):537-544. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.6.537
Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI. Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Fam Pract. 1998;15(6):519-524. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/15.6.519
Nazareth I, Boynton P, King M. Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross-sectional study. BMJ. 2003;327(7412):423. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7412.423
Peixoto MM, Nobre P. Prevalence of sexual problems and associated distress among lesbian and heterosexual women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(4):427-439. Available from: https://doi.org/:10.1080/0092623X.2014.918066
Cerejo A. Female sexual dysfunction: prevalence and related factors. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2006;22:701-720.
Peixoto MM, Nobre P. Prevalence of sexual problems and associated distress among lesbian and heterosexual women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(4):427-439. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.918066
Kuyper L, Vanwesenbeeck I. Examining sexual health differences between lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual adults: the role of sociodemographics, sexual behavior characteristics, and minority stress. J Sex Res. 2011;48(2-3):263-274. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224491003654473
Macedo A, Capela E, Peixoto M. Sexual satisfaction among lesbian and heterosexual cisgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare. 2023;11:1680. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121680
Ferreira A, Souza A. Female sexual dysfunctions. Femina. 2007;35(11):689-695.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed., text rev. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Melo AR. Emotional competence and social dimensions of academic experience in sociology students [master’s thesis]. Covilhã: University of Beira Interior; 2012.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500-1524. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cut-off scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230590475206
Pechorro P, Diniz A, Almeida S, Vieira R. Validação portuguesa do Índice de Funcionamento Sexual Feminino (FSFI). Laboratório de Psicologia. 2009;7:33-44. Available from: http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/lp/article/view/684
DeRogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D’Agostino D, Wunderlich G, Fu Y. Validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med. 2008;5(2):357-364. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00672.x
Tavares IM, Santos-Iglesias P, Nobre PJ. Psychometric validation of the Sexual Distress Scale in male and female Portuguese samples. J Sex Med. 2022;19:834-845. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.026
Meston C, Trapnell P. Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W). J Sex Med. 2005;2(1):66-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x
Peixoto M, Correia A, Gomes H, Machado P. Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women: a study with Portuguese women with and without sexual difficulties. Sex Relat Ther. 2018;35(3):304-319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2018.1497789
Purificação E, Santos A, Ferraz D. Sexual dysfunctions in young university women: a cross-sectional study. Rev Pesq Fisioter. 2021;11(2):307-319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i2.3612
Ribeiro B, Magalhães A, Mota I. Female sexual dysfunction in reproductive age. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2013;29(1):16-24.
Baron S, Florendo J, Sandbo S. Sexual pain disorders in women. Clinician Rev. 2011;21(5):32-38. Available from: https://www.mdedge.com/content/sexual-pain-disorders-women-0
Siqueira Lima I, Pereira de Sousa M, Queiroz Carvalho M, Rebouças Macedo S. Implications of vaginismus in women’s daily lives. Rev Bras Sexualidade Humana. 2020;31(1). Available from: file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/58-Texto%20do%20artigo%20(enviar%20arquivo)-760-748-10-20201029.pdf
Souza V, Tenetório V. Factors responsible for decreased sexual libido in elderly women [undergraduate thesis]. Maceió: CESMAC; 2019.
Siqueira Fernandes E, Farias Ferreira P. Use of testosterone in women with decreased or absent sexual interest/arousal. Rev Bras Sexualidade Humana. 2020;30(1). Available from: https://www.oasisbr.ibict.br/vufind/Record/SBRASH-1_28297342bd1d8059744d760d9e6e66cb
Trindade da Silva N, de Oliveira Damasceno S. Assessment of sexual satisfaction among university students. Colóquio Vitae. 2019;11(1):1-6.